Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Clin Cases. Jun 16, 2024; 12(17): 3012-3018
Published online Jun 16, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i17.3012
Table 2 Comparison of the degree of cerebral edema and brain damage between the two modalities, n (%)
Inspection methods
Hydrocephalus (above moderate, n = 20)
Brain damage to brain regions (> 2, n = 22)
Number of cerebral hemorrhages
(> 2, n = 17)
MRI19 (95.00)21 (95.45)16 (94.12)
CT11 (55.00)14 (63.63)8 (47.06)
χ28.5336.8449.067
P value< 0.05< 0.05< 0.05
Inspection methodsSubventricular hemorrhageIntraventricular hemorrhageIntracerebral hemorrhage
(n = 7)(n = 5)(n = 10)
MRI5 (71.43)4 (80.00)9 (90.00)
CT2 (28.577)3 (60.00)5 (50.00)
χ22.5710.4763.809
P value> 0.05> 0.05> 0.05
Inspection methodsSubarachnoid hemorrhageNumber and extent of cerebral infarctionsSmall venous dilatation (medicine)
(Yes, n = 8)(> 2, n = 7)(n = 8)
MRI7 (87.50)7 (100.00)8 (100.00)
CT8 (100.00)4 (57.14)1 (12.50)
χ21.0673.81812.444
P value> 0.05> 0.05< 0.05