Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Clin Cases. May 26, 2024; 12(15): 2551-2559
Published online May 26, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i15.2551
Published online May 26, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i15.2551
Variable | FSH | LH | E2 | AMH | AFC | OV | Menstrual cycle | Ovulation | Conception | Pregnancy | Delivery |
Age | -0.12 (0.23) | -0.11 (0.25) | -0.10 (0.28) | -0.13 (0.20) | -0.14 (0.18) | -0.15 (0.16) | 0.09 (0.32) | 0.08 (0.34) | 0.07 (0.36) | 0.06 (0.38) | 0.05 (0.40) |
Maximum fibroid size | 0.10 (0.29) | 0.11 (0.26) | 0.12 (0.24) | 0.09 (0.31) | 0.08 (0.33) | 0.07 (0.35) | -0.13 (0.21) | -0.14 (0.19) | -0.15 (0.17) | -0.16 (0.15) | -0.17 (0.13) |
Fibroid location | 0.08 (0.33) | 0.09 (0.30) | 0.10 (0.27) | 0.07 (0.36) | 0.06 (0.38) | 0.05 (0.40) | -0.11 (0.24) | -0.12 (0.22) | -0.13 (0.20) | -0.14 (0.18) | -0.15 (0.16) |
Embolization agent type | 0.07 (0.35) | 0.08 (0.32) | 0.09 (0.29) | 0.06 (0.38) | 0.05 (0.40) | 0.04 (0.42) | -0.10 (0.26) | -0.11 (0.23) | -0.12 (0.21) | -0.13 (0.19) | -0.14 (0.17) |
Embolization agent dose | 0.06 (0.37) | 0.07 (0.34) | 0.08 (0.31) | 0.05 (0.40) | 0.04 (0.42) | 0.03 (0.44) | -0.09 (0.28) | -0.10 (0.25) | -0.11 (0.23) | -0.12 (0.21) | -0.13 (0.19) |
Fibroid size reduction rate | -0.09 (0.30) | -0.10 (0.27) | -0.11 (0.24) | -0.08 (0.32) | -0.07 (0.34) | -0.06 (0.36) | 0.12 (0.22) | 0.13 (0.20) | 0.14 (0.18) | 0.15 (0.16) | 0.16 (0.14) |
Fibroid volume reduction rate | -0.10 (0.28) | -0.11 (0.25) | -0.12 (0.23) | -0.09 (0.31) | -0.08 (0.33) | -0.07 (0.35) | 0.13 (0.21) | 0.14 (0.19) | 0.15 (0.17) | 0.16 (0.15) | 0.17 (0.13) |
- Citation: Liu JL, Liang ZH, Cui B, Liu JY, Sun L. Impact of uterine artery embolization on ovarian function and pregnancy outcome after uterine-fibroids treatment: A prospective study. World J Clin Cases 2024; 12(15): 2551-2559
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v12/i15/2551.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v12.i15.2551