Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Clin Cases. May 26, 2024; 12(15): 2551-2559
Published online May 26, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i15.2551
Published online May 26, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i15.2551
Variable | UAE group (n = 87) | Control group (n = 87) | P value |
Age (yr) | 34.6 ± 4.2 | 34.8 ± 4.1 | 0.76 |
Body mass index (kg/m2) | 24.3 ± 3.5 | 24.5 ± 3.4 | 0.68 |
Parity | 0.9 ± 0.8 | 0.8 ± 0.7 | 0.54 |
Number of fibroids | 2.4 ± 1.2 | 2.3 ± 1.1 | 0.59 |
Size of largest fibroid (cm) | 5.6 ± 1.8 | 5.5 ± 1.7 | 0.71 |
Location of fibroids, n (%) | 0.82 | ||
Submucosal | 12 (13.8) | 14 (16.1) | |
Intramural | 48 (55.2) | 46 (52.9) | |
Subserosal | 27 (31.0) | 27 (31.0) | |
Type of fibroids, n (%) | 0.77 | ||
Pedunculated | 9 (10.3) | 8 (9.2) | |
Sessile | 78 (89.7) | 79 (90.8) |
- Citation: Liu JL, Liang ZH, Cui B, Liu JY, Sun L. Impact of uterine artery embolization on ovarian function and pregnancy outcome after uterine-fibroids treatment: A prospective study. World J Clin Cases 2024; 12(15): 2551-2559
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v12/i15/2551.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v12.i15.2551