Endovascular treatment of ruptured lobulated anterior communicating artery aneurysms: A retrospective study of 24 patients

Table 1 Characteristics of patient with ruptured lobulated anterior communicating artery aneurysm

Case Number	Age	Sex	Time from rupture to endovascular treatment (h)	Maximum diameter of the aneurysms (mm)	Neck width (mm)	Lobed number	Fisher's grade	Hunt-Hess grade	Glasgow Coma Scale score	Hydrocephalus	Methods of Treatment	Immediately postprocedural Raymond-Roy grade	Complication	Imaging follow-up method	Follow-up Raymond-Roy grade
1	39	Female	3	4.2	3	2	2	2	13	No	Single microcatheter embolization	1	No	CT angiography	1
2	42	Female	11	5.1	2.8	2	2	3	11	No	Single microcatheter embolization	1	No	CT angiography	1
3	63	Female	6	3.1	2.2	3	2	3	12	No	Auxiliary support coil embolization	1	No	Digital subtraction angiography	1
4	52	Male	7	5.8	4.1	2	2	3	12	No	Auxiliary support coil embolization	1	No	Digital subtraction angiography	1
5	43	Female	4	3.6	3.1	3	3	3	12	No	Auxiliary support coil embolization	1	No	Digital subtraction angiography	1
6	56	Female	6	3.7	2.7	2	3	4	11	No	External ventricular drainage; Double microcatheter embolization	1	No	CT angiography	1
7	71	Female	48	3.6	3	2	2	1	14	No	Single microcatheter embolization	1	No	CT angiography	1
8	48	Male	7	5.5	3	3	2	2	13	No	Double microcatheter embolization	1	No	CT angiography	1
9	61	Female	5	5.1	2.9	2	2	2	15	No	Double microcatheter embolization	1	No	CT angiography	1
10	55	Female	7	5	2.6	2	2	3	13	No	Double microcatheter embolization	1	No	CT angiography	1
11	65	Female	7	8.1	5.3	3	4	4	9	Yes	External ventricular drainage; Auxiliary support coil embolization	2	Arterial thrombosis	Digital subtraction angiography	2
12	58	Male	5	5.3	3	2	3	3	13	No	Auxiliary support coil embolization	1	No	Digital subtraction angiography	1
13	50	Female	10	4.6	2	2	2	3	13	No	Double microcatheter embolization	1	No	CT angiography	1
14	63	Female	26	5.1	2.1	2	2	3	13	No	Double microcatheter embolization	1	No	CT angiography	1
15	66	Male	6	5	3.2	2	4	4	9	Yes	Double microcatheter embolization	1	Communicating hydrocephalus	CT angiography	1
16	53	Male	8	6.1	3.9	2	3	3	12	No	Auxiliary support coil embolization	1	No	Digital subtraction angiography	1
17	74	Female	50	5.4	3.4	2	2	2	13	No	Double microcatheter embolization	1	No	CT angiography	1
18	61	Male	4	4.3	2.3	2	2	3	12	No	Auxiliary support coil embolization	1	No	Digital subtraction angiography	1
19	55	Male	5	5.7	3	2	3	3	12	No	Double microcatheter embolization	1	No	CT angiography	1
20	60	Female	5	5.7	3.8	3	2	3	12	No	Double microcatheter embolization	1	No	CT angiography	1
21	48	Female	8	5.4	2.5	2	2	3	13	No	Auxiliary support coil embolization	1	No	Digital subtraction angiography	1
22	53	Female	12	4.9	2.3	2	2	4	12	No	Double microcatheter embolization	1	No	CT angiography	1
23	63	Male	7	6.1	2.9	2	3	4	11	No	Auxiliary support coil embolization	1	No	Digital subtraction angiography	1
24	50	Male	6	5.5	2.8	2	2	4	11	No	Auxiliary support coil embolization	1	No	Digital subtraction angiography	1