Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Clin Cases. Mar 26, 2023; 11(9): 1903-1917
Published online Mar 26, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i9.1903
Published online Mar 26, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i9.1903
Ref. | Sample | Age (yr) | Intervention time | % female | Diagnosis of depression | EEG detail | |||||
Experimental group | Control group | Experimental group | Control group | Reference montage | EO/EC | Recording length (min) | Alpha range (Hz) | ||||
Arns et al[70], 2016 | EG: 236 Escitalopram, 251 Sertraline, 235 Venlafaxine-XR | CG: 336 controls | M = 38.85 (Escitalopram), M = 38.34 (Sertraline), M = 38.46 (Venlafaxine-XR), M = 37.84 (MDD) | M = 36.99 (Controls) | 8 wk | 57.03 | DSM–IV; MINI; HRSD | AM | E0+EC | 2 | 8–13 |
Vinne et al[71], 2019 | EG: 136 treatment with escitalo pram, 169 treatment with sertraline, 188 treatment with venlafaxine-extended release | 8 wk | 54.47 | MINI; HRSD; VQIDS-SR | AM | E0+EC | 4 | 8–13 | |||
Bares et al[72], 2019 | EG: 57 SSRIs, 46 SNRIs | M = 46.04 (SSRIs), M = 44.83 (SNRIs) | 1 wk | 74.76 | DSM IV; MADRS; CGI | Cz | EC | 10 | 8–13 | ||
Szumska et al[73], 2021 | EG: 12 Mindfulness group | CG: 8 control group | M = 32.40 (Mindfulness group) | M = 35.00 (Control group) | 8 wk | 55 | CES-D; MINI | Cz | E0+EC | 3 | 8–13 |
Keune et al[74], 2011 | EG: 78 MDD; 40 MBCT group | CG: 37 a wait-list condition | M = 48.93 (MBCT group) | M = 45.24 (wait-list group) | 8 wk | 74.03 | DSM-IV | AM | E0+EC | 8 | 8--13 |
Barnhofer et al[75], 2007 | EG: 10 MBCT | CG: 12 treatment-as-usual | M = 48.00 (MBCT) | M = 38.60 (treatment-as-usual) | 8 wk | 50 | MINI | AE | E0+EC | 8 | 8–13 |
Gollan et al[77], 2014 | EG: 37 MDD; Behavioral activation | CG: 35 non-MDD | 16 wk | 62.50 | DSM-IV; IDS-C | AM | E0+EC | 8 | 8–13 | ||
Allen et al[14], 2004 | EG: 30 nonpharmacological intervention | 8 wk | 100 | DSM–IV; HRSD | Cz; AM, AR | E0+EC | 8 | 8–13 | |||
Spronk et al[78], 2008 | EG: 8 MDD; rTMS Treatment | M = 42.60 (rTMS Treatment) | 37.50 | BDI; SCI | AM | E0+EC | 2 | alpha 1 (8–11); alpha 2 (11–13) | |||
Wang et al[80], 2016 | EG: 7 neurofeedback group | M = 47.43 | 6 wk | 78.57 | DSM-IV | Cz | EC | 5 | 8–12 | ||
Vlcek et al[79], 2020 | EG: 9 LF rTMS responder | CG: 16 LF rTMS non-responders | 4 wk | 80 | MINI; MADRS; CGI | Cz | EC | 10 | 8–12; 8–10; 10–12 |
- Citation: Xie YH, Zhang YM, Fan FF, Song XY, Liu L. Functional role of frontal electroencephalogram alpha asymmetry in the resting state in patients with depression: A review. World J Clin Cases 2023; 11(9): 1903-1917
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v11/i9/1903.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v11.i9.1903