Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Clin Cases. Mar 26, 2023; 11(9): 1888-1902
Published online Mar 26, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i9.1888
Table 2 Characteristics of endoscopic transluminal necrosectomy

Recommendations and benefits
Areas of concern
Ref.
Indications for necrosectomyUnsolved INP-associated symptomsConservative management or endoscopic drainage alone is sufficient in selected patients[77-80]
Endoscopic transluminal necrosectomyFirst-line therapy; recommended endoscopic step-up approach; increased life quality; reduced proinflammatory response, complications, hospitalization time, costs, and new-onset multiple organ failureOne single treatment may not suit all INP patients; no superiority in reducing major complications or mortality when compared with the surgical step-up procedure[6,8-10,71,83-85]
Improve necrosectomy efficiencyA solid component is better assessed by EUS than by CT scanningLack of unified assessment protocol for necrosis proportion[54]
Irrigation techniquesA three-step structured approach; saline, streptokinase, antibiotics, and hydrogen peroxide; reduced mortality and debridementsLack of optimal procedure and concentration; prolonged stent retrieval; perforation caused by forced irrigation[79,86-97]
Dedicated instrumentsOTSG; PED; WAND; safe and effective; reduced interventions and hospital durationEfficacy and indispensable safety; further research and popularization[98-100]
Predictors for complicationsSmall size (≤ 7 cm) and delayed stent removal (≥ 4 w); PD disruption, abnormal vessels, and requirements of percutaneous drainage or hybrid techniques; elevated intracavitary amylase; exocrine insufficiencyLack of prospective multicenter large-scale RCT[37,106-109]
Managing complicationsA novel algorithm for systematically managing hemorrhage events; LAMS with a larger diameter; mouthwash with chlorhexidine; suspension of PPI; timely follow-up and endoscopic management[60,62,63,74,79,101-104]
MDT strategyIndividualized treatment; reduced mortality; improved clinical outcomes; optimal strategy for patients with high risks of potential complicationsLack of standardized endoscopic protocol; considerable variations among endoscopists[11,79,110-112]