Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Clin Cases. Feb 16, 2023; 11(5): 1009-1018
Published online Feb 16, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i5.1009
Table 2 Cox regression analysis of factors related to hepatocarcinogenesis in the patients
VariableUnivariate
Multivariate
HR (95%CI)
P value
HR (95%CI)
P value
Age in yr, > 65 vs ≤ 651.16 (0.63, 2.10)0.6491.38 (0.62, 3.11)0.434
Sex, male vs female4.37 (1.98, 9.64)< 0.0013.47 (1.36, 8.89)0.010
Smoking status, yes vs no1.97 (1.15, 3.38)0.0131.46 (0.61, 3.45)0.394
Alcohol abuse status, yes vs no1.83 (0.44, 2.55)0.5581.38 (0.80, 1.68)0.008
Dyslipidemia, yes vs no1.58 (0.30, 2.09)0.0900.80 (0.36, 1.79)0.589
Diabetes mellitus, yes vs no2.54 (1.41, 4.59)0.0026.73 (2.77, 16.36)< 0.001
Ascites, yes vs no2.68 (1.20, 5.98)0.0161.41 (0.31, 6.43)0.660
Esophagogastric varices, yes vs no1.20 (0.37, 3.87)0.7660.62 (0.13, 2.97)0.552
AFP in ng/mL, > 20 vs ≤ 201.85 (0.98, 3.51)0.0593.89 (1.06, 14.27)0.041
γ-GTP in U/L, per SD1.24 (0.52, 2.14)0.6921.34 (0.75, 3.21)0.530
HBsAg, > 2.0 log IU/mL vs ≤ 2.0 log IU/mL1.74 (0.43, 2.28)0.2774.10 (1.52, 11.12)0.005
HBV DNA, ≤ 20000 IU/mL vs > 20000 IU/mL0.46 (0.20, 1.07)0.0721.09 (0.38, 3.15)0.877
HBeAg positivity, yes vs no0.59 (0.28, 1.28)0.1810.54 (0.20, 1.49)0.236
Antiviral treatment, yes vs no0.27 (0.16, 2.14)0.3650.74 (0.33, 1.67)0.475