Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Clin Cases. Nov 6, 2023; 11(31): 7570-7582
Published online Nov 6, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i31.7570
Published online Nov 6, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i31.7570
Table 2 Comparison of transcutaneous oxygen pressure values based on postoperative day in the group that received free flap
Value | Perforator | Distal | P value |
POD 1 | 8.64 ± 10.72 | 8.27 ± 11.62 | > 0.099 |
POD 5 | 18.64 ± 14.43 | 19.36 ± 16.11 | > 0.99 |
POD 10 | 14.00 ± 16.35 | 16.73 ± 15.51 | > 0.99 |
POD 15 | 13.82 ± 13.41 | 16.18 ± 13.40 | > 0.99 |
POD 20 | 17.82 ± 18.21 | 31.00 ± 26.81 | 0.972 |
POD 30 | 45.86 ± 33.20 | 47.14 ± 23.13 | > 0.99 |
POD 60 | 30.43 ± 21.95 | 35.57 ± 26.48 | > 0.99 |
POD 90 | 18.71 ± 5.35 | 18.71 ± 17.37 | > 0.99 |
POD 180 | 15.43 ± 11.10 | 19.57 ± 22.23 | > 0.99 |
POD 360 | 12.86 ± 7.78 | 16.43 ± 13.78 | > 0.99 |
- Citation: Lee DW, Hwang YS, Byeon JY, Kim JH, Choi HJ. Does the advantage of transcutaneous oximetry measurements in diabetic foot ulcer apply equally to free flap reconstruction? World J Clin Cases 2023; 11(31): 7570-7582
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v11/i31/7570.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v11.i31.7570