Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Clin Cases. Nov 6, 2023; 11(31): 7553-7561
Published online Nov 6, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i31.7553
Published online Nov 6, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i31.7553
Table 4 Comparison of diagnostic results and pathological results of three examination methods for ovarian tumors
| n | US | MRI | Tumor marker | Joint detection method | |||||
| Benign | Malignant | Benign | Malignant | Benign | Malignant | Benign | Malignant | ||
| Benign tumor | 60 | 48 | 12 | 51 | 9 | 49 | 11 | 59 | 1 |
| Malignant tumor | 50 | 12 | 38 | 8 | 42 | 4 | 46 | 0 | 50 |
| Total | 110 | 60 | 50 | 59 | 51 | 53 | 57 | 59 | 51 |
- Citation: Yang Q, Zhang H, Ma PQ, Peng B, Yin GT, Zhang NN, Wang HB. Value of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging combined with tumor markers in the diagnosis of ovarian tumors. World J Clin Cases 2023; 11(31): 7553-7561
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v11/i31/7553.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v11.i31.7553