Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Clin Cases. Nov 6, 2023; 11(31): 7553-7561
Published online Nov 6, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i31.7553
Published online Nov 6, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i31.7553
Table 2 Comparison of apparent diffusion coefficient value (mm2/s) and time-signal intensity curve image features [n (%)] between benign and malignant tumors
| Solid part ADC value | ADC value of cystic part | TIC image features | |||
| I type | II type | III type | |||
| Benign tumor | 1789.74 ± 122.53 | 2799.33 ± 89.88 | 46 (76.67) | 14 (23.33) | 0 (0.00) |
| Malignant tumor | 867.67 ± 15.87 | 2260.03 ± 91.75 | 0 (0.00) | 4 (0.08) | 46 (92.00) |
| χ2/t | 33.353 | 20.615 | 65.885 | 4.685 | 94.875 |
| P value | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.030 | 0.000 |
- Citation: Yang Q, Zhang H, Ma PQ, Peng B, Yin GT, Zhang NN, Wang HB. Value of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging combined with tumor markers in the diagnosis of ovarian tumors. World J Clin Cases 2023; 11(31): 7553-7561
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v11/i31/7553.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v11.i31.7553