Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Clin Cases. May 26, 2023; 11(15): 3491-3501
Published online May 26, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i15.3491
Published online May 26, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i15.3491
Table 5 Comparison of surgical indicators between the two groups (n, mean ± SD)
| Group | Pain score (point) | ABI difference before and after operation | Operation time (h) | Time to get out of bed (h) | Hospital stay (d) |
| Control group (n = 34) | 3.97 ± 0.94 | 0.59 ± 0.13 | 3.51 ± 0.45 | 25.18 ± 1.77 | 8.04 ± 0.75 |
| Observation group (n = 28) | 1.71 ± 0.71 | 0.56 ± 0.11 | 2.53 ± 0.32 | 16.32 ± 2.48 | 5.80 ± 0.98 |
| t value | 10.480 | 0.739 | 9.579 | 16.390 | 10.150 |
| P value | 0.000 | 0.463 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
- Citation: Meng XH, Xie XP, Liu YC, Huang CP, Wang LJ, Liu HY, Fang X, Zhang GH. Observation of the effect of angiojet to treat acute lower extremity arterial embolization. World J Clin Cases 2023; 11(15): 3491-3501
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v11/i15/3491.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v11.i15.3491