Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Clin Cases. May 16, 2023; 11(14): 3195-3203
Published online May 16, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i14.3195
Published online May 16, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i14.3195
Time | TBT | 95%CI | AIST | 95%CI | P value |
Day 1 | 9.4 ± 0.6 | 1.0 | 7.5 ± 0.5 | 0.9 | 0.032 |
Day 3 | 7.5 ± 0.5 | 0.9 | 4.8 ± 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.028 |
Day 7 | 4.1 ± 0.6 | 0.8 | 2.5 ± 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.004 |
2 wk | 2.6 ± 0.5 | 0.8 | 0.6 ± 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.011 |
1 mo | 1.2 ± 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.5 ± 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.023 |
6 mo | 0.8 ± 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.6 ± 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.815 |
1 yr | 0.4 ± 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.3 ± 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.782 |
2 yr | 0.3 ± 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.1 ± 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.769 |
- Citation: An BJ, Wang YT, Zhao Z, Wang MX, Xing GY. Comparative study of the clinical efficacy of all-inside and traditional techniques in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. World J Clin Cases 2023; 11(14): 3195-3203
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v11/i14/3195.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v11.i14.3195