Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Clin Cases. May 16, 2023; 11(14): 3187-3194
Published online May 16, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i14.3187
Published online May 16, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i14.3187
Table 1 Comparison of baseline data between the three patient groups (mean ± SD, n)
Group | Age (yr) | Gender (male/female) | Equivalent sphere diameter (D) | Mean refraction (D) |
Group A (n = 60) | 36.45 ± 3.78 | 22/38 | -1.78 ± 2.21 | -0.44 ± 1.56 |
Group B (n = 66) | 35.48 ± 3.24 | 30/36 | -2.16 ± 2.15 | 0.65 ± 2.45 |
Group C (n = 70) | 36.15 ± 3.12 | 36/34 | -2.57 ± 2.45 | -1.05 ± 2.15 |
F/χ2 value | 1.384 | 2.858 | 1.949 | 1.430 |
P value | 0.253 | 0.240 | 0.145 | 0.242 |
- Citation: Mu H, Li RS, Yin Z, Feng ZL. Value of optical coherence tomography measurement of macular thickness and optic disc parameters for glaucoma screening in patients with high myopia. World J Clin Cases 2023; 11(14): 3187-3194
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v11/i14/3187.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v11.i14.3187