Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Clin Cases. May 16, 2023; 11(14): 3148-3157
Published online May 16, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i14.3148
Published online May 16, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i14.3148
Groups | HAMD score | HAMA score | ||||
At admission | At discharge | After discharge | At admission | At discharge | After discharge | |
Control group | 34.17 ± 1.49 | 25.23 ± 1.74a | 31.10 ± 1.85c | 26.27 ± 2.23 | 21.53 ± 1.96a | 31.83 ± 2.00c |
Intervention group | 33.93 ± 1.23 | 17.33 ± 2.54a,c | 11.13 ± 1.59a,c | 25.20 ± 2.83 | 15.23 ± 1.76a,c | 10.57 ± 2.39a,c |
T value | 0.662 | 14.076 | 44.884 | 1.621 | 13.112 | 37.385 |
P value | 0.510 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.110 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
- Citation: Xu XY, Pang ZJ, Li MH, Wang K, Song J, Cao Y, Fang M. Impact of extended nursing model after multi-disciplinary treatment on young patient with post-stroke. World J Clin Cases 2023; 11(14): 3148-3157
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v11/i14/3148.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v11.i14.3148