Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Clin Cases. May 16, 2023; 11(14): 3148-3157
Published online May 16, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i14.3148
Published online May 16, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i14.3148
Groups | SAS score | SDS score | ||||
At admission | At discharge | After discharge | At admission | At discharge | After discharge | |
Control group | 65.43 ± 2.08 | 55.17 ± 3.00a | 71.13 ± 2.91c | 68.13 ± 2.50 | 57.27 ± 2.75a | 73.47 ± 2.97c |
Intervention group | 65.57 ± 3.97 | 21.13 ± 2.52a,c | 17.33 ± 3.06c | 69.27 ± 2.65 | 25.13 ± 2.65a,c | 16.53 ± 2.27c |
T value | -0.163 | 47.660 | 69.849 | -1.703 | 46.065 | 83.452 |
P value | 0.871 | < 0.000 | < 0.000 | 0.094 | < 0.000 | < 0.000 |
- Citation: Xu XY, Pang ZJ, Li MH, Wang K, Song J, Cao Y, Fang M. Impact of extended nursing model after multi-disciplinary treatment on young patient with post-stroke. World J Clin Cases 2023; 11(14): 3148-3157
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v11/i14/3148.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v11.i14.3148