Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Clin Cases. May 6, 2023; 11(13): 2981-2991
Published online May 6, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i13.2981
Table 2 Inspiratory muscle training used in each study
No.
Ref.
Length
Frequency
Duration
Supervision
Intensity
1Hulzebos et al[12], 2006≥ 2 wk preoperativelyOnce a day20 mins6 times a week without supervision and once a week with supervision30% of MIP. Resistance increases incrementally, based on the RPE scored on the Borg scale
2Savci et al[17], 20115 d preoperatively + 5 d postoperativelyTwice a day30 minsEach session was under the supervision of a physical therapist15% of MIP. The resistance was increased incrementally between 15% and 45% based on patient’s tolerance in the following days
3Moises et al[18], 2014Preoperative (length not mentioned)Once a day20 minsEach session was under supervision40% of MIP. Intensity increase not mentioned
4Valkenet et al[6], 2016Not mentionedOnce a day20 min6 times a week without supervision and once a week with supervision30% of MIP. Increased incrementally based on the RPE as scored on the Borg scale. If patients recorded an RPE score < 5 after a training session, they were instructed to increase the inspiratory load of the threshold device by 5% before the next training session. The threshold load was unchanged for RPE scores ≥ 5
5Chen et al[19], 20195 d preoperativelyTwice a day20 minEach session was under the supervision of a physical therapist30% of MIP. Increased incrementally, based on the RPE scored on the Borg18 scale. If the RPE was less than 5, the resistance of the inspiratory threshold trainer was then increased incrementally by 5%. Training loads were adjusted to maintain 30% of the maximal inspiratory pressure every day
6Weber et al[20], 2021≥ 2 wk preoperativelyOnce a day20 minNot mentionedNot mentioned