Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Clin Cases. May 6, 2023; 11(13): 2945-2955
Published online May 6, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i13.2945
Published online May 6, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i13.2945
Table 6 Comparison of endometrial thickness and blood flow resistance
| Detection Method | Endometrial thickness | Blood flow resistance in the endometrium | ||
| ≤ 1.5 mm | ≥ 1.5 mm | ≤ 0.5 | ≥ 0.5 | |
| TAS group (n = 63) | 36 (57.14) | 27 (42.86) | 24 (38.10) | 39 (61.90) |
| TVS group (n = 77) | 46 (59.74) | 31 (40.26) | 43 (55.84) | 34 (44.16) |
| χ2 | 1.096 | 4.374 | ||
| P value | 0.019 | 0.036 | ||
- Citation: Hu HJ, Sun J, Feng R, Yu L. Comparison of the application value of transvaginal ultrasound and transabdominal ultrasound in the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy. World J Clin Cases 2023; 11(13): 2945-2955
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v11/i13/2945.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v11.i13.2945