Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Clin Cases. May 6, 2023; 11(13): 2945-2955
Published online May 6, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i13.2945
Table 4 Comparison of sonographic performance differences between two types of ultrasounds for the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy

TAS group (n = 63)
TVS group (n = 77)
χ2
P
Extrauterine mixed mass17 (26.98)34 (44.16)0.0540.036
Ectopic gestational sac shadow43 (68.25)65 (84.42)0.0390.023
Uterine rectal fossa fluid15 (23.81)8 (10.39)0.0570.033
Fetal heart and embryo in the shadow of ectopic gestational sac45 (71.43)66 (85.71)0.0620.038
Adnexal area12 (19.05)27 (35.06)0.0560.035
Yolk sac52 (82.54)73 (94.81)0.0390.020
Consistent with the diagnosis152 (82.61)231 (84.62)0.0620.045