Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Clin Cases. May 6, 2023; 11(13): 2945-2955
Published online May 6, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i13.2945
Published online May 6, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i13.2945
TAS group (n = 63) | TVS group (n = 77) | χ2 | P | |
Extrauterine mixed mass | 17 (26.98) | 34 (44.16) | 0.054 | 0.036 |
Ectopic gestational sac shadow | 43 (68.25) | 65 (84.42) | 0.039 | 0.023 |
Uterine rectal fossa fluid | 15 (23.81) | 8 (10.39) | 0.057 | 0.033 |
Fetal heart and embryo in the shadow of ectopic gestational sac | 45 (71.43) | 66 (85.71) | 0.062 | 0.038 |
Adnexal area | 12 (19.05) | 27 (35.06) | 0.056 | 0.035 |
Yolk sac | 52 (82.54) | 73 (94.81) | 0.039 | 0.020 |
Consistent with the diagnosis | 152 (82.61) | 231 (84.62) | 0.062 | 0.045 |
- Citation: Hu HJ, Sun J, Feng R, Yu L. Comparison of the application value of transvaginal ultrasound and transabdominal ultrasound in the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy. World J Clin Cases 2023; 11(13): 2945-2955
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v11/i13/2945.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v11.i13.2945