Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Clin Cases. May 6, 2023; 11(13): 2945-2955
Published online May 6, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i13.2945
Published online May 6, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i13.2945
Group | Age (years), mean ± SD | Multiparas | Primipara | Urine HCG (weak) positive | Blood HCG (weak) positive |
TAS group (n = 63) | 35.57 ± 3.65 | 24 (38.10) | 39 (61.90) | 58 (92.06) | 60 (95.23) |
TVS group (n = 77) | 35.56 ± 3.78 | 34 (44.16) | 43 (55.84) | 72 (93.51) | 75 (97.40) |
T/χ2 | 0.017 | 0.581 | 0.399 | ||
P value | 0.987 | 0.469 | 0.310 |
- Citation: Hu HJ, Sun J, Feng R, Yu L. Comparison of the application value of transvaginal ultrasound and transabdominal ultrasound in the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy. World J Clin Cases 2023; 11(13): 2945-2955
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v11/i13/2945.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v11.i13.2945