Is metaphyseal ulnar shortening osteotomy superior to diaphyseal ulnar shortening osteotomy in the treatment of ulnar impaction syndrome? A meta-analysis

doi:10.12998/wjcc.v11.i12.2753

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 11, Issue 12

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (2581)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Figures (1-7) series, Tables (1-5) series.

Item

Count

PDF

WORD

106

HTML

1570

Figures (1-7)

168

Tables (1-5)

173

Sum=2099

Publishing Process of This Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

133

Download

349

Sum=482

Apr 26, 2023 (publication date) through Nov 29, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (2)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Clinical Cases

ISSN

2307-8960

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Meta-Analysis

World J Clin Cases. Apr 26, 2023; 11(12): 2753-2765
Published online Apr 26, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i12.2753

Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 6 Secondary procedure rate.

Citation: Deng HL, Lu ML, Tang ZM, Mao QL, Zhao JM. Is metaphyseal ulnar shortening osteotomy superior to diaphyseal ulnar shortening osteotomy in the treatment of ulnar impaction syndrome? A meta-analysis. World J Clin Cases 2023; 11(12): 2753-2765
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v11/i12/2753.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v11.i12.2753