Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Clin Cases. Apr 16, 2023; 11(11): 2423-2434
Published online Apr 16, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i11.2423
Table 2 Comparison of variables according to type of segmented gallbladder
Variables


Type 1, n = 36
Types 2 & 3, n = 27
P value
Age in year50.2 ± 9.652.3 ± 13.20.483
Male14 (38.9%)15 (55.6%)0.212
Atypical symptoms4 (11.1%)5 (18.5%)0.48
Biliary colic pain7 (19.4%)3 (11.1%)0.494
Radiological findings
GB stone22 (61.1%)15 (55.6%)0.797
Location of GB stone0.147
Proximal5 (22.7%)0 (0.0%)0.067
Distal15 (68.2%)13 (86.7%)0.262
Both2 (9.1%)2 (13.3%)0.999
GB sludge1 (2.8%)1 (3.7%)0.999
GB polyp5 (13.9%)3 (11.1%)0.999
Adenomyomatosis10 (27.8%)8 (29.6%)0.999
Chronic cholecystitis25 (69.4%)20 (74.1%)0.782
Reported GBEF, %62.50 ± 24.7980.11 ± 15.70< 0.001
Cholecystectomy26 (72.2%)19 (70.4%)0.999
Pathology1
Adenomyomatosis3 (11.5%)2 (10.5%)0.999
Chronic cholecystitis24 (92.3%)17 (89.5%)0.999
Cholesterol polyp4 (15.4%)3 (15.8%)0.999