Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Clin Cases. Jan 6, 2023; 11(1): 116-126
Published online Jan 6, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i1.116
Published online Jan 6, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i1.116
Table 2 Primary diagnosis of 200 central venous port implanted patients
| Primary diagnosis | n (%) |
| Gastrointestinal system cancers | 115 (57.5) |
| Breast cancers | 28 (14.0) |
| Pancreaticobiliary system cancers | 26 (13.0) |
| Head and neck cancers | 11 (5.0) |
| Gynecologic cancers | 9 (4.5) |
| Soft tissue sarcomas | 4 (2.0) |
| Lung cancers | 3 (1.5) |
| Lymphomas | 2 (1.0) |
| Renal cell cancer | 1 (0.5) |
| Adenocarcinoma of unknown origin | 1 (0.5) |
- Citation: Erdemir A, Rasa HK. Impact of central venous port implantation method and access choice on outcomes. World J Clin Cases 2023; 11(1): 116-126
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v11/i1/116.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v11.i1.116