Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Mar 16, 2022; 10(8): 2529-2536
Published online Mar 16, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i8.2529
Published online Mar 16, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i8.2529
Ref. | Age | Sex | Smoker | Stage | Histology | MET fusion | Best overall response | PFS (mo) | Grade ≥ 3 AEs | Notes |
[5] | 33 | F | Yes | IV | ADC | KIF5B-MET | PR | 8 | NR | |
[5] | 62 | F | No | IV | ADC | STARD3NL-MET | PR | 14 | NR | |
[6] | 51 | F | No | IV | ADC | KIF5B-MET | PR | 10 | NR | |
[7] | 74 | F | No | Recurrent | ADC | HLA-DRB1-MET | Complete resolution of nodules while pleural effusion persisted | 8 | No | |
[8] | 59 | F | No | Recurrent | ADC | HLA-DRB1-MET | Complete radiographic response | / | No | |
[9] | 43 | F | No | IV | ADC | MET-UBE2H | PR | 6.5 | NR | MET fusion was acquired on EGFR-targeted therapy |
[10] | 56 | F | No | IV | ADC | MET–ATXN7L1 | PR | 4 | NR |
- Citation: Liu LF, Deng JY, Lizaso A, Lin J, Sun S. Effective response to crizotinib of concurrent KIF5B-MET and MET-CDR2-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer: A case report. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(8): 2529-2536
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v10/i8/2529.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i8.2529