Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Mar 16, 2022; 10(8): 2420-2428
Published online Mar 16, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i8.2420
Published online Mar 16, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i8.2420
ICC | |
CAARMS Subscale | |
Positive symptoms | 0.93 |
Cognitive change | 0.75 |
Attention/concentration/emotional disturbance | 0.74 |
Negative symptoms | 0.88 |
Behavioral change | 0.75 |
Motor/physical changes | 0.85 |
General psychopathology | 0.93 |
Total | 0.9 |
SIPS Subscale | |
Family History Questionnaire | 0.9 |
The Scale of Psychosis-Risk Symptoms | 0.8 |
The Global Assessment of Functioning | 0.72 |
Schizotypal Personality Disorder Checklist (DSM-5) | 0.81 |
Summary of SIPS data | 0.92 |
Summary of SIPS syndrome criteria | 0.88 |
Total | 0.89 |
BSABS Subscale | |
Adynamia (A + B) | 0.87 |
Cognitive disorder € | 0.76 |
Cenesthesia experience (D) | 0.82 |
Dysfunction of central autonomic nerve € | 0.88 |
Self-protection (F) | 0.89 |
Total | 0.85 |
- Citation: Wang P, Yan CD, Dong XJ, Geng L, Xu C, Nie Y, Zhang S. Identification and predictive analysis for participants at ultra-high risk of psychosis: A comparison of three psychometric diagnostic interviews. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(8): 2420-2428
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v10/i8/2420.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i8.2420