Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Mar 16, 2022; 10(8): 2420-2428
Published online Mar 16, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i8.2420
Published online Mar 16, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i8.2420
Table 3 Diagnostic comparison between the comprehensive assessment of at-risk mental states and the bonn scale for the assessment of basic symptoms outcomes in participants of the research group (P < 0.001)
| CAARMS outcomes | Total | |||||
| UHR− | UHR+ | Psychosis | ||||
| BSABS outcomes | UHR− | Count | 158 | 1 | 0 | 159 |
| Ratio, % | 83.6 | 0.53 | 0 | 84.13 | ||
| UHR+ | Count | 3 | 9 | 5 | 17 | |
| Ratio, % | 1.58 | 4.76 | 2.65 | 8.99 | ||
| Psychosis | Count | 1 | 2 | 10 | 13 | |
| Ratio, % | 0.53 | 1.06 | 5.29 | 6.88 | ||
| Total | Count | 162 | 12 | 15 | 189 | |
| Ratio, % | 85.71 | 6.35 | 7.94 | 100 | ||
- Citation: Wang P, Yan CD, Dong XJ, Geng L, Xu C, Nie Y, Zhang S. Identification and predictive analysis for participants at ultra-high risk of psychosis: A comparison of three psychometric diagnostic interviews. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(8): 2420-2428
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v10/i8/2420.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i8.2420