Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Mar 6, 2022; 10(7): 2106-2114
Published online Mar 6, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i7.2106
Published online Mar 6, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i7.2106
Table 1 Comparison of thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow grades and thrombolysis in myocardial infarction myocardial perfusion grade grading after stent implantation between the two groups, n (%)
| Group | Deferred group (n = 92) | Immediate group (n = 72) | Z | P value |
| TIMI flow grades | -2.302 | 0.021 | ||
| 0 degree | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | ||
| 1 degree | 2 (2.17) | 6 (8.33) | ||
| 2 degree | 24 (26.09) | 26 (36.11) | ||
| 3 degree | 66 (71.74) | 40 (55.56) | ||
| TMPG grading | -1.836 | 0.066 | ||
| 0 degree | 0 (0.00) | 0 (0.00) | ||
| 1 degree | 3 (3.26) | 8 (11.11) | ||
| 2 degree | 28 (30.43) | 25 (34.72) | ||
| 3 degree | 61 (66.30) | 39 (54.17) |
- Citation: Zhuo MF, Zhang KL, Shen XB, Lin WC, Hu B, Cai HP, Huang G. Postoperative adverse cardiac events in acute myocardial infarction with high thrombus load and best time for stent implantation. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(7): 2106-2114
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v10/i7/2106.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i7.2106