Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Mar 6, 2022; 10(7): 2087-2094
Published online Mar 6, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i7.2087
Published online Mar 6, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i7.2087
Table 1 Comparison of the demographic data of the control and acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis groups
| Variable | Control group, n = 30 | ACJO group, n = 35 | Statistical significance |
| Gender (male/female) | 9/21 | 14/21 | NS |
| Age (yr) | 57.30 ± 7.56 | 60.60 ± 9.31 | NS |
| ACJSW (mm) | 3.51 ± 0.58 | 2.02 ± 0.48 | P < 0.001 |
| ACJCSA (mm2) | 39.88 ± 10.60 | 18.80 ± 5.13 | P < 0.001 |
| Location (Rt/Lt) | 13/17 | 22/13 | NS |
- Citation: Joo Y, Moon JY, Han JY, Bang YS, Kang KN, Lim YS, Choi YS, Kim YU. Usefulness of the acromioclavicular joint cross-sectional area as a diagnostic image parameter of acromioclavicular osteoarthritis. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(7): 2087-2094
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v10/i7/2087.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i7.2087