Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Feb 16, 2022; 10(5): 1473-1484
Published online Feb 16, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i5.1473
Table 3 The management of pain caused by the natural cavity noninvasive catheterization
Operational type
Ref.
Drugs
Advantages
Disadvantages
FiberbronchoscopyChalumeau-Lemoine et al[26], 2013RemifentanilShorten the operational time, reduce discomfort, and have better antitussive effectMay cause respiratory arrest
Gupta et al[28], 20142% lignocaine and viscous lignocaine garglesEffectively relieve pain and provide comfortNot mentioned
Kundra et al[27], 2000Translaryngeal block, bilateral superior laryngeal nerve block and three 4% lignocaine-soaked cotton swabs in the nose (CRB group)Provided better patient comfort and haemodynamic stabilityNot mentioned
Nasogastric tube intubationCullen et al[33], 2004Nebulized lidocaineCan significantly alleviate painCan cause complications such as nosebleeds
Ducharme and Matheson[32], 20032% lidocaine gelEffectively alleviate pain and is easy to useNot mentioned
Wolfe et al[31], 20004% Nebulized lidocaineSignificantly alleviate painNot mentioned
Singer and Konia[30], 1999Lidocaine, tetracaineAlleviate painAdverse events such as vomiting and nosebleeds
Urethral catheterizationChung et al[35], 2007Lidocaine gelAlleviate painNot mentioned
Siderias et al[34], 2004Lidocaine gelAlleviate painNot mentioned