Comparison of the clinical performance of i-gel and Ambu laryngeal masks in anaesthetised paediatric patients: A meta-analysis

doi:10.12998/wjcc.v10.i4.1242

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 10, Issue 4

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Supplementary Materials of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (3763)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Figures (1-6) series, Tables (1-1) series.

Item

Count

PDF

367

WORD

HTML

1988

Figures (1-6)

227

Tables (1-1)

234

Sum=2915

Publishing Process of This Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

248

Download

600

Sum=848

Feb 6, 2022 (publication date) through Jul 19, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (3)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Clinical Cases

ISSN

2307-8960

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Meta-Analysis

World J Clin Cases. Feb 6, 2022; 10(4): 1242-1254
Published online Feb 6, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i4.1242

Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 3 Forest plot of oropharyngeal leak pressure: Ambu vs i-gel. The mean leak pressure was higher in the i-gel group than in the Ambu group, with substantial heterogeneity (21.82 cmH₂O for Ambu vs 23.98 cmH₂O for i-gel, P = 0.003, 95% confidence interval: -3.58 to -0.75, I² = 68%, Mantel-Haenszel random model). CI: Confidence interval.

Citation: Bao D, Yu Y, Xiong W, Wang YX, Liang Y, Li L, Liu B, Jin X. Comparison of the clinical performance of i-gel and Ambu laryngeal masks in anaesthetised paediatric patients: A meta-analysis. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(4): 1242-1254
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v10/i4/1242.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i4.1242