Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Feb 6, 2022; 10(4): 1182-1189
Published online Feb 6, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i4.1182
Published online Feb 6, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i4.1182
No-tunnel (n = 115), n (%) | Tunnel (n = 107), n (%) | P value | |
Low efficiency | 4 (3.48) | 2 (1.87) | 0.6845 |
Peritonitis | 11 (9.57) | 6 (5.61) | 0.3186 |
Abdominal wall leak | 1 (0.87) | (0.93) | > 0.9999 |
Abdominal surgery | 1 (0.87) | 0 (0.00) | > 0.9999 |
Inguinal hernia | 0 (0.00) | 2 (1.87) | 0.2312 |
Personal choice | 2 (1.74) | 0 (0.00) | 0.4984 |
Transplantation | 4 (3.48) | 2 (2.80) | > 0.9999 |
Death | 4 (3.48) | 10 (9.35) | 0.0975 |
- Citation: Lee CY, Tsai MK, Chen YT, Zhan YJ, Wang ML, Chen CC. Importance of the creation of a short musculofascial tunnel in peritoneal dialysis catheter placement. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(4): 1182-1189
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v10/i4/1182.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i4.1182