Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Feb 6, 2022; 10(4): 1182-1189
Published online Feb 6, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i4.1182
Published online Feb 6, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i4.1182
No-tunnel (n = 115) | Tunnel (n = 107) | P value | |
Age (yr, mean ± SD) | 57.03 ± 17.88 | 58.49 ± 16.38 | 0.4093 |
Male, n (%) | 64 (55.65) | 67 (62.62) | 0.3395 |
BMI (kg/m2, mean ± SD) | 23.85 ± 4.27 | 24.16 ± 4.07 | 0.5884 |
Cause of ESRD, n (%) | 0.1434 | ||
GN | 26 (22.61) | 23 (21.50) | |
Polycystic kidney | 2 (1.74) | 5 (4.67) | |
Diabetes mellitus | 17 (14.78) | 26 (24.30) | |
Others | 70 (60.87) | 53 (49.52) | |
History of abdominal surgery, n (%) | 22 (19.13) | 18 (16.82) | 0.7279 |
- Citation: Lee CY, Tsai MK, Chen YT, Zhan YJ, Wang ML, Chen CC. Importance of the creation of a short musculofascial tunnel in peritoneal dialysis catheter placement. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(4): 1182-1189
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v10/i4/1182.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i4.1182