Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Dec 26, 2022; 10(36): 13321-13336
Published online Dec 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i36.13321
Published online Dec 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i36.13321
Patients, n | Leakage | P value | |
Absent, n = 522 | Present, n = 61 | ||
Mortality | 2 (40.0) | 3 (60.0) | 0.009 |
Reoperation | 0 | 35 (100) | 0.0001 |
Peritonitis/abdominal sepsis | 1 (4.6)1 | 21 (95.4) | 0.0001 |
Pelvic sepsis | 2 (3.7)1 | 53 (96.3) | 0.0001 |
Wound dehiscence | 3 (42.9) | 4 (57.1) | 0.003 |
Wound infection | 10 (52.8) | 7 (41.2) | 0.0008 |
Urinary infection | 10 (76.9) | 3 (23.1) | 0.1 |
Urinary retention2 | 3 (33.4) | 6 (66.6) | 0.0001 |
Pneumonia | 3 (60.0) | 2 (40.0) | 0.08 |
- Citation: Brisinda G, Chiarello MM, Pepe G, Cariati M, Fico V, Mirco P, Bianchi V. Anastomotic leakage in rectal cancer surgery: Retrospective analysis of risk factors. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(36): 13321-13336
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v10/i36/13321.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i36.13321