Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Dec 26, 2022; 10(36): 13284-13292
Published online Dec 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i36.13284
Published online Dec 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i36.13284
Table 2 Distance to the lower border of the tumor according to localization by rigid endoscopy and enema examination
Classification | Rigid endoscope | Enema examination | |||||
mean ± SD | Range | n | mean ± SD | Range | n | ||
RS | 10.3 ± 2.3 | 6-13.5 | 12 (11.8) | 12.3 ± 2.8 | 7-21 | 105 (29.9) | |
Ra | 7.7 ± 1.6 | 5-12 | 38 (37.6) | 7.2 ± 2.3 | 3-18 | 90 | |
Rb | 3.5 ± 1.8 | 0-7 | 54 (53.4) | 3.2 ± 2.3 | 0-10 | 156 | |
0-5 cm | 6-10 cm | 11-15 cm | > 15 cm | Total | |||
RS | 0 | 28 (26.6) | 66 (62.8) | 11 (10.4) | 105 | ||
Ra | 17 (18.8) | 67 (74.4) | 5 (4.4) | 1 (1.1) | 90 | ||
Rb | 132 (84.6) | 24 (15.3) | 0 | 0 | 156 |
- Citation: Miyakita H, Kamei Y, Chan LF, Okada K, Kayano H, Yamamoto S. Classification of rectal cancer according to recurrence types - comparison of Japanese guidelines and Western guidelines. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(36): 13284-13292
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v10/i36/13284.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i36.13284