Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Dec 26, 2022; 10(36): 13274-13283
Published online Dec 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i36.13274
Table 1 Scoring method of the Huaxi Unplanned Extubation Risk Assessment Scale
CharacteristicsOptionsScoring
Age14-65 years old/< 14 or ≥ 65 years old1/2
State of consciousnessMedium or deep coma/Awake/Lethargy, light coma, or drowsiness/Blurred consciousness, irritability, or delirium1/2/3/4
Degree of understandingUnderstanding, newborn or deep sedation/Partial understanding/Incomprehension1/2/3
Emotional stateStable or deep sedation/Sometimes stable/Unstable1/2/3
Degree of cooperationCooperative/Sometimes cooperative/Uncooperative1/2/3
Tolerance degree of tubesTolerable/Pain or discomfort, but basically tolerable/Pain or discomfort leads to intolerance of the tube1/2/3
Number of tubes1/2-3/3 or more1/2/3
Type of tubesPICC; CVC, Jejunostomy, Splittable catheter, Pericardial drainage tube, Abdominal wound drainage tube, Bladder and kidney fistulas, Perirenal drainage tube; Tracheotomy tube, Closed thoracic drainage tube, Urinary catheter, Gastric tube, Nasointestinal canal, Double capsule three lumen tube, Radial artery puncture tube, Internal jugular vein puncture tube, Lumbar cistern drainage tube, Ventricular drainage tube and other head drainage tubes, Cervical plasma drainage tube, Breast plasma drainage tube; Oronasal endotracheal intubation1/2/3/4
Fixation mode of tubesSuture/Holder, water bag, airbag, or tie wrap/Adhesive tape1/2/3
Activity abilityAutonomous activity/Using walking aids, unstable walking, or need help/Absolute bed rest0/1/2