Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Dec 6, 2022; 10(34): 12587-12593
Published online Dec 6, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i34.12587
Published online Dec 6, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i34.12587
Table 3 Comparison of speech function grades between the two groups
Group | Grade 1 | Grade 2 | Grade 3 | Grade 4 | Grade 5 | |||||
Pre-treatment, % | Post-treatment, % | Pre-treatment, % | Post-treatment, % | Pre-treatment, % | Post-treatment, % | Pre-treatment, % | Post-treatment, % | Pre-treatment, % | Post-treatment, % | |
Control group (n = 45) | 13 (28.89) | 5 (11.11)a | 23 (51.11) | 13 (28.89)a | 6 (13.33) | 11 (24.44)a | 3 (6.67) | 14 (31.11)a | 0 (0) | 2 (4.44)a |
Treatment group (n = 45) | 14 (31.11) | 0 (0)a b | 21 (46.67) | 2 (4.44)a,b | 7 (15.56) | 17 (37.78)a,b | 2 (4.44) | 19 (42.22)a,b | 1 (2.22) | 7 (15.56)a,b |
- Citation: Man B, Li WW, Xu JF, Wang Q. Clinical study on tri-tongue acupuncture combined with low-frequency electrical stimulation for treating post-stroke dysarthria. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(34): 12587-12593
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v10/i34/12587.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i34.12587