Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Nov 26, 2022; 10(33): 12146-12155
Published online Nov 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i33.12146
Published online Nov 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i33.12146
Table 3 Comparison of surgical indicators between the two groups (mean ± SD)
| Group | Operation time (min) | Anesthesia time (min) | Total rehydration (mL) | Urine volume (mL) |
| Group A (n = 60) | 216.3 ± 20.5 | 233.8 ± 19.5 | 2568.1 ± 208.4 | 398.5 ± 58.1 |
| Group B (n = 60) | 212.0 ± 22.7 | 229.5 ± 22.8 | 2590.4 ± 211.7 | 410.3 ± 63.5 |
| t value | 1.089 | 1.110 | -0.581 | -1.062 |
| P value | 0.278 | 0.269 | 0.562 | 0.290 |
- Citation: Wang Y, Yang Y, Wang DM, Li J, Bao QT, Wang BB, Zhu SJ, Zou L. Different positive end expiratory pressure and tidal volume controls on lung protection and inflammatory factors during surgical anesthesia. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(33): 12146-12155
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v10/i33/12146.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i33.12146