Comprehensive analysis of the relationship between cuproptosis-related genes and esophageal cancer prognosis

Table 3 The results of the univariate Cox regression analysis

Gene name	HR	HR.95L	HR.95H	P value
PDHA1	22.96	3.09	170.73	0.002
ATP7A	3.83	0.96	15.21	0.057
CDKN2A	0.84	0.64	1.10	0.204
PDHB	1.76	0.37	8.50	0.479
GLS	1.50	0.48	4.67	0.484
ATP7B	1.15	0.77	1.71	0.496
FDX1	1.52	0.41	5.59	0.527
DLD	1.82	0.27	12.11	0.534
LIPT2	0.87	0.46	1.64	0.662
DLST	0.58	0.05	6.70	0.662
NFE2L2	0.73	0.18	3.04	0.666
DLAT	1.43	0.23	8.89	0.702
DBT	0.83	0.27	2.54	0.744
GCSH	0.87	0.32	2.36	0.777
MTF1	0.85	0.26	2.80	0.785
LIAS	0.86	0.25	2.93	0.806
NLRP3	0.91	0.44	1.90	0.809
LIPT1	1.14	0.29	4.41	0.853
SLC31A1	1.08	0.19	6.15	0.928

HR: Hazard ratio; HR.95L: Low 95% confidence interval of HR; HR.95H: High 95% confidence interval of HR.