Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Nov 26, 2022; 10(33): 12089-12103
Published online Nov 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i33.12089
Published online Nov 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i33.12089
Variables | Total, n = 151 | Esophagus cancer, n = 151 | |
Adenocarcinoma, n = 74 | Squamous cell carcinoma, n = 77 | ||
Age, yr | |||
Median | 60 | 68.5 | 57 |
Interquartile range | (53-72) | (57-77) | (51-63.5) |
Sex | |||
Female | 22 (14.6%) | 11 (14.9%) | 11 (14.3%) |
Male | 129 (85.4%) | 63 (85.1%) | 66 (85.7%) |
AJCC-TNM Stage | |||
Ⅰ | 18 (11.9%) | 11 (14.9%) | 7 (9.1%) |
Ⅱ | 70 (46.4%) | 24 (32.4%) | 46 (59.7%) |
Ⅲ | 51 (33.8%) | 31 (41.9%) | 20 (26.0%) |
Ⅳ | 12 (7.9%) | 8 (10.8%) | 4 (5.2%) |
EGFR status | |||
Mutant | 5 (3.3%) | 3 (4.1%) | 2 (2.6%) |
Wild-type | 146 (96.7%) | 71 (95.9%) | 75 (97.4%) |
KRAS status | |||
Mutant | 2 (1.3%) | 2 (2.7%) | 0 (0) |
Wild-type | 149 (98.7%) | 72 (97.3%) | 77 (100%) |
BRAF status | |||
Mutant | 1 (0.7%) | 0 (0) | 1 (1.3%) |
Wild-type | 150 (99.3%) | 74 (100%) | 76 (98.7) |
PIK3CA status | |||
Mutant | 14 (9.3%) | 4 (5.4%) | 10 (13.0%) |
Wild-type | 137 (90.7%) | 70 (94.6%) | 67 (87.0%) |
OS event | |||
Event | 58 (38.4%) | 36 (48.6%) | 22 (28.6%) |
Non-event | 93 (61.6%) | 38 (51.4%) | 55 (71.4%) |
OS months | |||
Median | 13.4 | 14.8 | 13.0 |
Range | (7.8-22.9) | (7.3-27.5) | (11.0-18.6) |
PFS event | |||
Event | 73 (48.3%) | 38 (51.4%) | 35 (45.5%) |
Non-event | 78 (51.7%) | 36 (48.6%) | 42 (54.5%) |
PFS months | |||
Median | 10.7 | 10.3 | 10.7 |
Range | (5.1-18.9) | (5.4-24.5) | (3.7-15.8) |
- Citation: Xu H, Du QC, Wang XY, Zhou L, Wang J, Ma YY, Liu MY, Yu H. Comprehensive analysis of the relationship between cuproptosis-related genes and esophageal cancer prognosis. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(33): 12089-12103
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v10/i33/12089.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i33.12089