Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Nov 16, 2022; 10(32): 11753-11765
Published online Nov 16, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i32.11753
Published online Nov 16, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i32.11753
Table 6 Changes in pain rating index affective pain scores after receiving treatment
| Group | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | Wald χ2 | P value |
| CG (n = 55) | 1 (0-2) | 1 (0-2) | 1 (0-2) | 1 (1-2) | 78.635 | 0.000 |
| EG (n = 58) | 1 (0-2) | 0 (0-1) | 1 (0-1) | 1 (0-1) | 128.366 | 0.000 |
| Wald χ2 | 3.227 | 5.489 | 5.588 | 23.485 | ||
| P value | 0.072 | 0.019 | 0.018 | 0.000 |
- Citation: Xiao J, Cao BY, Xie Z, Ji YX, Zhao XL, Yang HJ, Zhuang W, Sun HH, Liang WM. Clinical efficacy of electromagnetic field therapy combined with traditional Chinese pain-reducing paste in myofascial pain syndrome. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(32): 11753-11765
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v10/i32/11753.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i32.11753