Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Nov 16, 2022; 10(32): 11753-11765
Published online Nov 16, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i32.11753
Published online Nov 16, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i32.11753
Table 5 Changes in pain rating index sensory pain scores after treatment
| Group | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | Wald χ2 | P value |
| CG (n = 55) | 4 (2-5) | 3 (1-4) | 4 (2-5) | 4 (3-5) | 45.488 | 0.000 |
| EG (n = 58) | 3 (2-4) | 3 (2-4) | 2 (1-3) | 2 (1-4) | 197.864 | 0.000 |
| Wald χ2 | 10.353 | 13.305 | 28.271 | 63.510 | ||
| P value | 0.001 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
- Citation: Xiao J, Cao BY, Xie Z, Ji YX, Zhao XL, Yang HJ, Zhuang W, Sun HH, Liang WM. Clinical efficacy of electromagnetic field therapy combined with traditional Chinese pain-reducing paste in myofascial pain syndrome. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(32): 11753-11765
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v10/i32/11753.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i32.11753