Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Nov 16, 2022; 10(32): 11712-11725
Published online Nov 16, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i32.11712
Published online Nov 16, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i32.11712
Parameters | P value | HR | 95% CI | |
Lower | Higher | |||
Age, yr | 0 | 1.218 | 1.140 | 1.302 |
ISS stage | 0.007 | 2.256 | 1.249 | 4.076 |
ALT | 0.057 | 1.015 | 1.000 | 1.030 |
AST | 0.240 | 1.009 | 0.994 | 1.023 |
LDH | 0.199 | 1.001 | 0.999 | 1.004 |
Treatment | 0.192 | 1.482 | 0.821 | 2.672 |
DM | 0.005 | 3.458 | 1.456 | 8.213 |
- Citation: Hu SL, Liu M, Zhang JY. Comparing the efficacy of different dexamethasone regimens for maintenance treatment of multiple myeloma in standard-risk patients non-eligible for transplantation. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(32): 11712-11725
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v10/i32/11712.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i32.11712