Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Nov 6, 2022; 10(31): 11325-11337
Published online Nov 6, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i31.11325
Table 3 Endoscopic efficacy and safety in patients with or without liver cirrhosis underwent endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection
Clinical data
Cirrhosis (n = 25)
Noncirrhosis (n = 75)
P value
Number of tunnels0.430
Single tunnel17 (68.0)57 (76.0)
Multiple tunnels8 (32.0)18 (24.0)
R0 resection22 (88.0)65 (86.7)1.000
Curative resection19 (76.0)57 (76.0)1.000
Dissection speed, mm²/min (SD)24.5 (11.6)21(11.8)0.200
Intraoperative bleeding12 (48.0)26 (34.7)0.234
30-d post-ESTD bleeding2 (8.0)0 (0)0.099
Muscular injury5 (20.0)23 (30.7)0.304
Prednisone used post-ESTD5 (20.0)18 (24.0)0.681
Stenosis2 (8.0)12 (16.0)0.506
Perforation0 (0)3 (4.0)0.735
Post-ESTD fever11 (44.0)21 (28.0)0.137
Post-ESTD pneumonia2 (8.0)16 (21.3)0.229
Hospitalization, day (SD)14.9 (7.5)10.3 (4.5)0.007
Post-ESTD duration, d (SD)6.5 (2.9)6.1 (2.9)0.523
Hospitalization costs, $ (SD)4985.9 (1815.7)4083.8 (759.0)0.023
Median follow-up time, months45390.430
Local Recurrence1 (4)3 (4)1.000
OS17 (68.0)71 (94.7)0.001
DSS24 (96.0)75 (100.0)0.075
RFS24 (96.0)72 (96.0)0.8196