Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Oct 26, 2022; 10(30): 10931-10938
Published online Oct 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i30.10931
Published online Oct 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i30.10931
Table 3 Comparison of liver function index levels before and after surgery between the two groups (mean ± SD)
Groups | DBIL (umol/L) | TBIL (umol/L) | ALT (U/L) |
Pre-operative | |||
Research Group (n = 47) | 182.10 ± 82.33 | 258.62 ± 100.54 | 38.56 ± 7.18 |
Control group (n = 47) | 178.89 ± 79.59 | 261.45 ± 96.77 | 40.04 ± 6.69 |
t value | 0.198 | 0.139 | 1.034 |
P value | 0.844 | 0.890 | 0.304 |
1 d after surgery | |||
Research Group (n = 47) | 93.37 ± 40.02a | 156.98 ± 83.31a | 26.83 ± 6.65a |
Control group (n = 47) | 111.51 ± 36.33a | 191.03 ± 72.12a | 30.13 ± 7.92a |
t value | 2.301 | 2.118 | 2.188 |
P value | 0.024 | 0.037 | 0.031 |
- Citation: Niu H, Liu F, Tian YB. Clinical observation of laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography or common bile duct lithotripsy. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(30): 10931-10938
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v10/i30/10931.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i30.10931