Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Oct 26, 2022; 10(30): 10931-10938
Published online Oct 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i30.10931
Published online Oct 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i30.10931
Table 2 Comparison of recovery of gastrointestinal function between the two groups (mean ± SD, h)
Groups | Anal venting time | Time to start eating | Recovery time of bowel sounds | Defecation time |
Research Group (n = 47) | 25.02 ± 3.68 | 7.82 ± 3.44 | 16.56 ± 3.58 | 33.35 ± 6.07 |
Control group (n = 47) | 28.29 ± 4.11 | 9.62 ± 4.09 | 18.94 ± 4.29 | 36.96 ± 7.11 |
t value | 4.064 | 2.309 | 2.920 | 2.647 |
P value | 0.000 | 0.023 | 0.004 | 0.010 |
- Citation: Niu H, Liu F, Tian YB. Clinical observation of laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography or common bile duct lithotripsy. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(30): 10931-10938
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v10/i30/10931.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i30.10931