Effectiveness of Maitland and Mulligan mobilization methods for adults with knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Table 2 Quality of included studies by PEDro Scale

Author	C1	C2	C3	C4	C5	C6	C7	C8	C9	C10	C11	TS	Level of evidence
Lalnunpuii et al[31], 2016	1	1	0	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	10	A2
Rao et al[34], 2017	1	1	0	1	1	0	1	1	0	1	1	8	B
Kiran et al[14], 2018	1	1	0	1	0	0	0	1	1	1	1	7	B
Mutlu et al[33], 2018	1	1	1	1	1	0	1	1	0	1	1	9	B
Giri et al[32], 2019	1	1	0	1	0	0	0	1	1	1	1	7	B
Jeyakumar et al[30], 2017	1	1	1	1	0	0	0	1	1	1	1	8	B
Sambandam et al[31], 2011	0	1	0	1	0	0	1	1	1	1	1	7	B
Lalit et al[15], 2012	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	1	1	1	5	B

C1: Eligibility criteria were specified; C2: Subjects were randomly allocated to groups (in a crossover study, subjects were randomly allocated an order in which treatments were received); C3: Allocation was concealed; C4: The groups were similar at baseline regarding the most important prognogstic indicators; C5: There was blinding of all subjects; C6: There was blinding of all therapists who administered the therapy; C7: There was blinding of all assessors who measured at least one key outcome; C8: Measurements of at least one key outcome were obtained from more than 85% of the subjects initially allocated to groups; C9: All subjects for whom outcome measurements were available received the treatment or control condition as allocated, or where this was not the case, data for at least one key outcome were analyzed by "Intention to treat"; C10: The result of between-group statistical comparisons were reported for at least one key outcome; C11: The study provided both point measurements and measurements of variability for at least one key outcome; 0: Does not meet the included criteria; 1: Meets the included criteria. TS: Total score.