Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Jan 21, 2022; 10(3): 929-938
Published online Jan 21, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i3.929
Published online Jan 21, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i3.929
Table 2 Comparison of Hamilton depression rating scale scores and self-rating depression scale scores between the two groups (mean ± SD, scores)
Group | n | HAMD score (points) | SDS score (points) | ||||
Before treatment | 4 wk of treatment | 8 wk of treatment | Before treatment | 4 wk of treatment | 8 wk of treatment | ||
Acupuncture group | 80 | 20.13 ± 2.20 | 16.60 ± 2.85a | 13.64 ± 2.75a | 61.84 ± 4.55 | 56.92 ± 5.10a | 51.14 ± 6.12a |
Fluoxetine group | 80 | 19.75 ± 2.38 | 17.21 ± 2.91a | 15.20 ± 2.48a | 60.63 ± 4.92 | 57.88 ± 5.53a | 54.63 ± 5.58a |
t value | 1.049 | -1.340 | -3.768 | 1.615 | -1.141 | -3.769 | |
P value | 0.296 | 0.182 | 0.000 | 0.108 | 0.255 | 0.000 |
- Citation: Wang Y, Huang YW, Ablikim D, Lu Q, Zhang AJ, Dong YQ, Zeng FC, Xu JH, Wang W, Hu ZH. Efficacy of acupuncture at ghost points combined with fluoxetine in treating depression: A randomized study. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(3): 929-938
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v10/i3/929.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i3.929