Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Oct 6, 2022; 10(28): 10042-10052
Published online Oct 6, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i28.10042
Published online Oct 6, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i28.10042
Group | Breast-conserving group | Modified radical cure group | t/χ2 | P value | |
n | 69 | 41 | |||
Age (yr) | 37.1 ± 7.1 | 39.2 ± 6.8 | -1.523 | 0.131 | |
BMI (kg/m2) | 23.9 ± 1.9 | 23.2 ± 1.7 | 1.941 | 0.055 | |
Affected side distribution, n (%) | Left side | 34 (49.28) | 25 (60.98) | 1.416 | 0.243 |
Right side | 35 (50.72) | 16 (39.02) | |||
Lesion diameter (cm) | 2.18 ± 0.68 | 2.34 ± 0.70 | -1.18 | 0.24 | |
Pathology type | Invasive ductal carcinoma | 43 (62.32) | 23 (56.1) | 2.171 | 0.538 |
Ductal carcinoma in situ | 15 (21.74) | 7 (17.07) | |||
Lobular carcinoma in situ | 6 (8.70) | 7 (17.07) | |||
Other types | 5 (7.25) | 4 (9.76) |
- Citation: Ren Y, Zhang J, Zhang JD, Xu JZ. Efficacy of digital breast tomosynthesis combined with magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of early breast cancer. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(28): 10042-10052
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v10/i28/10042.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i28.10042