Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Sep 26, 2022; 10(27): 9611-9618
Published online Sep 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i27.9611
Published online Sep 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i27.9611
Table 3 Comparison of the 36-item Shot-Form Health Survey scores in the two groups after care
| Groups | Physical function (score) | Role status (score) | Social function (score) | Pain (score) | Mental health (score) | Physical condition (score) |
| Research group (n = 98) | 69.23 ± 5.12 | 75.06 ± 6.01 | 63.12 ± 4.23 | 70.24 ± 5.13 | 79.22 ± 7.03 | 64.15 ± 6.13 |
| Control group (n = 80) | 60.23 ± 6.12 | 68.23 ± 6.12 | 60.13 ± 5.19 | 65.23 ± 6.03 | 72.06 ± 7.04 | 58.23 ± 6.17 |
| t value | 10.697 | 7.480 | 4.235 | 5.989 | 6.755 | 6.397 |
| P value | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
- Citation: He YH, Wang F. PDCA nursing in improving quality management efficacy in endoscopic submucosal dissection. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(27): 9611-9618
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v10/i27/9611.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i27.9611