Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Aug 26, 2022; 10(24): 8625-8633
Published online Aug 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i24.8625
Published online Aug 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i24.8625
Name of assessment | Ref. | Type of participants | Type of assessment | Cut-off score | Time limit | Outcomes |
Ota test | Ota et al[9], 2001 | n = 2. Stroke patients (only RBD) | Pencil and paper | EN: The number of omitted complete targets; AN: The number of selected incomplete targets | No limit | The test is developed in order to distinguish EN and AN with one task |
Apples test | Bickerton et al[12], 2011 | n = 111. Experimental group: 25 (stroke patients-LBD: 7, RBD: 18); Control group: 86 (healthy participants) | Pencil and paper | Left EN: > 2; Right EN: < -2; Left AN: > 1; Right AN: < -1 | 5 min | The test provides a clinically applicable measure of different forms of neglect (EN and AN) |
Broken hearts test | Demeyere et al[13], 2015 | n = 348. Experimental group: 208 (acute stroke patients-LBD: 84, RBD: 101, Both: 19, Unknown: 4); Control group: 140 (healthy participants) | Pencil and paper | Left EN: > 3; Right EN: < -3; Left AN: > 1; Right AN: < -1 | 3 min | The test presented the validity and applicability of the OCS in acute stroke assessment |
Computerised cancellation test | Mizuno et al[24], 2015 | n = 19. Experimental group: 3 (stroke patients-only RBD, AND has neglect: 2, AND without neglect: 1); Control group: 16 (healthy participants) | Digital test (touchscreen) | EN: The number of omitted complete targets; AN: The number of selected incomplete targets (Ota test only) | No mention | The test is developed a computer-based programme to evaluate EN and AN |
MonAmour robot test | Montedoro et al[25], 2019 | n = 91. Experimental group: 35 (stroke patients-LBD: 12, RBD: 23, AND has EN: 25, AND without EN: 10; Control group: 56 (healthy participants) | Digital test(Robot) | Left EN: ≥ 1Right EN: ≤ -1Left AN: ≥ 1Right AN: ≤ -1 | 7 s (each trial) | The test is a valid, sensitive, and reliable tool that can diagnose EN and AN |
3s spreadsheet test v2 | Chen et al[23], 2021 | n = 209. Experimental group: 23 (stroke patients, only RBD); Control group: 186 (healthy participants) | Pencil and paper test | Left EN: > 3; Right EN: < -3; Left AN: > 5; Right AN: < -3 | No limit (mean ± SD): 202.0 ± 64.6 s | The test may increase the comprehensiveness of the neglect assessment |
ReMoVES platform | Ferraro et al[26], 2021 | n = 18. Experimental group: 12 (neglect patients); Control group: 6 (healthy participants) | Digital test (touchscreen) | Left EN: > 2; Right EN: < -2; Left AN: > 1; Right AN: < -1 (apples test only) | 5 min (apples test only) | Traditional and digital versions are correlated and they yield very similar results, thus denoting them to be interchangeable |
- Citation: Lee SH, Lim BC, Jeong CY, Kim JH, Jang WH. Assessment tools for differential diagnosis of neglect: Focusing on egocentric neglect and allocentric neglect. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(24): 8625-8633
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v10/i24/8625.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i24.8625