Randomized Controlled Trial
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Aug 26, 2022; 10(24): 8615-8624
Published online Aug 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i24.8615
Table 2 Comparison between the conventional mask group and the high-flow nasal cannula oxygen group before the intervention

Conventional mask group (n = 30)
HFNCO group (n = 30)
P value
Before anesthesia
HR75.9 ± 11.474.7 ± 9.60.652
MAP118.8 (109.0, 128.3)119.8 (105.0, 126.6)0.6521
SpO298.0 (97.0, 100.0)99.0 (97.0, 100.0)0.3211
pH7.42 (7.40, 7.43)7.42 (7.41, 7.44)0.2611
paCO237.7 (75.4, 39.7)38.9 (36.5, 40.6)0.3291
paO278.9 (70.5, 85.3)76.8 (70.0, 84.0)0.9531
Glucose5.5 (5.3, 6.6)5.6 (5.3, 6.3)0.9471
Lactic acid1.3 (1.0, 1.8)1.3 (1.1, 1.5)0.6891
Extubation
HR78.6 ± 11.873.9 ± 11.30.122
MAP107.8 (102.3, 126.0)110.5 (96.8, 117.5)0.6631
SpO2100.0 (99.0, 100.0)100.0 (100.0, 100.0)0.0401
pH7.33 (7.30, 7.35)7.33 (7.30, 7.37)0.3671
paCO248.1 (43.6, 54.1)48.0 (43.6, 54.7)0.9761
paO275.1 (64.0, 86.3)74.0 (67.2, 89.7)0.7511
Glucose6.2 (5.7, 7.5)6.6 (5.4, 7.5)0.9001
Lactic acid1.8 (1.5, 2.2)1.7 (1.3, 2.5)0.9411